Wrong SKU or variant
Compare stable artwork, text or decoded product data with the active recipe or upstream selection.
Recipe-controlled matchingCheck that every visible label is present, correctly positioned and matched to the selected product—then verify critical artwork, dates and codes where required.
A machine-vision system can inspect every presented pack for the label features defined as critical: presence, position, front/back pairing, approved SKU artwork, product name, selected warning or allergen region, barcode value and variable date or batch print. It verifies the production label against configured rules; it does not replace the business’s legal artwork approval or label-control process.
Presentation faults, wrong-product labels and incorrect variable data require different tools and tolerances. The strongest projects define each failure in observable terms and prove it with representative samples.
Compare stable artwork, text or decoded product data with the active recipe or upstream selection.
Recipe-controlled matchingConfirm that the expected approved label variant and selected warnings, symbols or text blocks are present.
Reference-based verificationRead or verify best-before, use-by, lot, batch and supported machine-readable codes.
OCR, OCV and code toolsMeasure presence, vertical and horizontal position, rotation and front/back alignment.
Defined presentation limitsUse multi-view inspection where a barcode, seam or artwork feature may appear around the circumference.
Container-specific camera layoutTrack the failed product to a suitable reject device and confirm containment where required.
Reject, stop or alarm
Food and drink packs can be glossy, wet, transparent, chilled, irregular or unstable. Normal product variation must be separated from meaningful label faults without creating excessive false rejects.
The difficult test is often a label that looks plausible for the product but belongs to another approved variant. Build the trial around those near matches and around the point where the line changes from one product to the next.
Choose two real product variants whose labels share most of their design. Mark the small features that distinguish them, such as a product name, language panel or decoded identifier. Confirm that these features are visible on the presented pack. The inspection reference must come from the authorised production selection; simply accepting whichever label is loaded first cannot independently confirm that selection.
Where a pack uses several labels, define the permitted combination rather than checking each panel in isolation. Challenge a missing rear panel, a rear label from the other variant and a correctly positioned but obsolete design. If the second panel is hidden at the proposed camera location, include another view or another inspection stage in the concept.
Identify how the product, label supply, expected code and inspection recipe change together. Include old packs remaining between the camera and reject point. Demonstrate what happens after a stopped conveyor, an aborted changeover or an incomplete recipe update. Keep uncertain packs under the agreed disposition procedure rather than assuming that restarting has cleared the line.
Test valid-looking but incorrect dates and lot values as well as faint or missing print. Agree the expected data source and permitted formats before evaluating text recognition. The food business remains responsible for approving label content; the optical check compares the configured visible information. Use barcode and text verification guidance to define the comparison separately from readability.
Keep known wrong-label packs that were accepted separate from approved packs rejected unnecessarily. Retain the challenge identity, recipe version and observed pack response. Report the tested variants and viewing limits with the result so a successful two-variant demonstration is not treated as proof for an untested label family.
UK guidance requires prepacked food information to be accurate and not misleading, including mandatory label information and allergen declarations where applicable. Vision inspection can support production control by checking that the expected approved label is on the correct pack.
See the official GOV.UK packaging and labelling guidance and food information guidance. Legal and retailer requirements should be defined by the food business; the inspection system verifies configured visible features and data.
It can help verify that the selected product carries the expected approved label by checking stable artwork, text or code features against the active recipe. It does not determine whether the approved artwork itself is legally correct.
Yes, when both regions are visible at sufficient resolution. Small date print on a different face may require another camera or a separate inspection point.
The enclosure, frame, guarding and installation can be selected around the cleaning regime. The required ingress protection, materials, drainage and hygienic design expectations must be stated before design.
Yes. The inspection can control a pusher, air blast, diverter, drop-flap or line stop. Reject confirmation, bin-full monitoring and fail-safe responses can be added where the risk assessment requires them.
Include filled packs, the least favourable normal print and appearance, target speed, changeover method and reject requirement.